I'm crossing my fingers. From what I can tell, because it directly contradicts a part of the state constitution, the equal protection clause or something like that, it would have had to been passed by 2/3rds of the legislature to be valid because it's changing the constitution rather than adding on to it? I really gotta pay better attention when I read things.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2008-11-07 07:26 am (UTC)